I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: C. Milbradt, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: JLO Holding Company LLC (Santa Monica, United States of America)
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 July 2009 in case R 609/2008-1 insofar as it made an order for revocation of the Community trade mark No 984 245‘LIVE’ for the goods, soaps, perfumery, cosmetic products and make-up;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the word mark ‘LIVE’ for goods in Class 3 (Community trade mark No 984 245)
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: JLO Holding Company LLC
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partial revocation of the Community trade mark
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the Cancellation Division's decision and partial revocation of the Community trade mark
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), on the ground that it was proved that the trade mark at issue in the proceedings had been used in such a way as to preserve the rights of the proprietor for the product group, soups, perfumery, cosmetic products and make-up
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).