- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-229/15: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2017 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v EBA (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Provision of interim staff for IT services — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0229
62015TA0229
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.1.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 5/27
(Case T-229/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Provision of interim staff for IT services - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment))
(2018/C 005/36)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) and European Dynamics Belgium SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: I. Ampazis, M. Sfyri, C.-N. Dede and D. Papadopoulou, then M. Sfyri, C.-N. Dede and D. Papadopoulou, lawyers)
Defendant: European Banking Authority (EBA) (represented by: J. Overett Somnier, J. Mifsud and S. Giordano, acting as Agents, assisted by H.-G. Kamann and A. Dritsa, lawyers)
Re:
First, an action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the EBA of 2 March 2015 rejecting the applicants’ tender submitted in response to the restricted tendering procedure EBA/2014/06/OPS/SER/RT with respect to Lot 1, titled ‘Supply of interim staff: Supply of interim staff for Information Technology’ and, second, an action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for harm that the applicants allegedly suffered following that decision as a result of the loss of opportunity to be ranked in first place in the cascade the contract award procedure at issue, amounting to EUR 300 000, together with interest
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and European Dynamics Belgium SA to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 262, 10.8.2015