EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-562/19 RENV: Order of the General Court of 25 April 2023 — Klein v Commission (Actions for failure to act — Medical devices — Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 93/42/EEC — Safeguard clause procedure — Notification by a Member State of a decision prohibiting the placing on the market of a medical device — Absence of a decision by the Commission — Repeal of Directive 93/42 — Articles 94 to 97 of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 — Market surveillance measures — Action manifestly well founded)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0562(01)

62019TB0562(01)

April 25, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

26.6.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/28

(Case T-562/19 RENV) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Actions for failure to act - Medical devices - Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 93/42/EEC - Safeguard clause procedure - Notification by a Member State of a decision prohibiting the placing on the market of a medical device - Absence of a decision by the Commission - Repeal of Directive 93/42 - Articles 94 to 97 of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 - Market surveillance measures - Action manifestly well founded)

(2023/C 223/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Christoph Klein (Großgmain, Austria) (represented by: H.-J. Ahlt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes, E. Sanfrutos Cano and F. Thiran, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 265 TFEU, the applicant asks the General Court to declare that the European Commission unlawfully failed to act in the safeguard clause procedure initiated on 7 January 1998 by the Federal Republic of Germany and to take a decision in accordance with Directive 93/42/EEC of the Council of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices (OJ 1993 L 169, p. 1), in relation to the ‘Inhaler Broncho-Air®’ device.

Operative part of the order

1.The European Commission has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8(2) of Directive 93/42/EEC of the Council of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices by failing to act in the safeguard clause procedure initiated on 7 January 1998 by the Federal Republic of Germany and to take a decision in accordance with Directive 93/42, replaced by Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42, in relation to the Inhaler Broncho-Air® device.

2.The Commission shall pay the costs related to the appeal proceedings before the Court in Case C-430/20 P and those related to the initial proceedings in Case T-562/19 and to the proceedings referred back to the General Court in Case T-562/19 RENV.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia