- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-263/09: Action brought on 7 July 2009 — Mannatech v OHIM (BOUNCEBACK)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0263
62009TN0263
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.8.2009
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 205/46
(Case T-263/09)
2009/C 205/84
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant(s): Mannatech, Inc. (Coppell, United States) (represented by R. Niebel and C. Steuer, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2009 in case R 100/2009-1; and
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “BOUNCEBACK” for goods in class 5
Decision of the examiner: Refused the applicant’s trade mark
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Council Regulation 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal erred in its application of the legal standards laid down in the said legal provisions.