- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-88/14: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Actions for annulment — Regulation (EU) No 1289/2013 — Article 1(1) and (4) — Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 — Article 1(4)(f) — Article 290 TFEU — Suspension of exemption from the visa requirement — Insertion of a footnote — Amendment of the legislative act)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CA0088
62014CA0088
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 302/5
(Case C-88/14) (1)
((Actions for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 1289/2013 - Article 1(1) and (4) - Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 - Article 1(4)(f) - Article 290 TFEU - Suspension of exemption from the visa requirement - Insertion of a footnote - Amendment of the legislative act))
(2015/C 302/06)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, B. Martenczuk and G. Wils, acting as Agents)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, A. Troupiotis and A. Pospíšilová Padowska, acting as Agents)
Council of the European Union (represented by K. Pleśniak and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendants: Czech Republic (represented by M. Smolek, D. Hadroušek and J. Škeřík, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;
3.Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.