- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-746/16: Order of the General Court of 17 October 2017 — Andreassons Åkeri and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Social security — Commission decision to close an EU Pilot procedure — Decision to take no further action on a complaint — Refusal of the Commission to bring infringement proceedings — Act not open to challenge — Lack of direct concern — Manifest inadmissibility — Application seeking the issue of an injunction — Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0746
62016TB0746
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.12.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 424/37
(Case T-746/16)(Action for annulment - Social security - Commission decision to close an EU Pilot procedure - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Refusal of the Commission to bring infringement proceedings - Act not open to challenge - Lack of direct concern - Manifest inadmissibility - Application seeking the issue of an injunction - Manifest lack of jurisdiction)
(2017/C 424/53)
Language of the case: Swedish
Parties
Applicants: Andreassons Åkeri i Veddige AB (Veddige, Sweden), Luke Transport AB (Laholm, Sweden), Zimit Transportförmedling AB (Veddige) (represented by: C. von Quitzow, Professor)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission decision contained in the letter of 10 August 2016 concerning the outcome of EU Pilot Procedure 7504/15/EMPL.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Andreassons Åkeri i Veddige AB, Luke Transport AB and Zimit Transportförmedling AB shall pay the costs.
Language of the case: Swedish.
(1)
OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2017:140
15