I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-210/19) (*)
(Action for annulment - Common agricultural policy - Binding rules relating to the regulation of the supply of cheese benefiting from a protected designation of origin - Refusal of the application for the adoption of implementing acts - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 61/55)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicants: Societá Agricola Tenuta di Rimale (Fidenza, Italy) and the 9 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Libertini, A. Scognamiglio and M. Spolidoro, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and F. Moro, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 6 February 2019 (Ares(2019) 677860) refusing the applicants’ application for (i) a declaration as to the alleged infringement by the Italian authorities of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671) and of Article 101 TFEU; and (ii) the adoption by the Commission of implementing acts, on the basis of Article 150(8) of that regulation, requiring that the Italian Republic repeal rules relating to the regulation of the supply of Parmigiano Reggiano cheese for the period 2017-2019.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Societá Agricola Tenuta di Rimale and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex are ordered to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: Italian.
(1) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019
* * *