I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
10.3.2025
(C/2025/1455)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: NFL Properties Europe GmbH (Eschborn, Germany) (represented by: M. Kloth and M. Tillwich, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Treets GmbH (Forchheim, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SUPER BOWL’ – EU trade mark No 3 513 058
Proceedings before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 November 2024 in Case R 886/2024-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—amend the contested decision to the effect that the complaint is upheld in its entirety and the decision on revocation annulled, in so far as it found that the applicant’s EU mark has been revoked;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 27(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1455/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—