EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-667/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 23 December 2016 — M.N.J.P.W. Nooren & J.M.F.D.C. Nooren, heirs of M.N.F.M. Nooren v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0667

62016CN0667

December 23, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.3.2017

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/12

(Case C-667/16)

(2017/C 078/17)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: M.N.J.P.W. Nooren & J.M.F.D.C. Nooren, heirs of M.N.F.M. Nooren

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken

Questions referred

1.Has the EU legislature provided for the possibility, in Articles 70, 71 and 72 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 (1) of 30 November 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system, under the direct support schemes for farmers provided for that regulation, as well as for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards cross-compliance under the support scheme provided for the wine sector, — in situations such as that in the main proceedings, in which there are multiple instances of non-compliance within the same area of cross-compliance — of aggregating the reductions of aid for repeated and unrepeated instances of negligent non-compliance with cross-compliance requirements, on the one hand, and for instances of intentional non-compliance with cross-compliance conditions, on the other?

2.If so, which article or article section provides the basis for this and what is the calculation rule for such aggregation?

3.If not, can a basis for this be found elsewhere under EU law?

(1) OJ 2009 L 316, p. 65.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia