- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-677/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Polfarmex v EUIPO — Kaminski (SYRENA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark SYRENA — Genuine use of the mark — Extent of use — Proof of use — Articles 18(1) and 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0677
62019TA0677
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/35
(Case T-677/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark SYRENA - Genuine use of the mark - Extent of use - Proof of use - Articles 18(1) and 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty to state reasons - First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2020/C 399/51)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Polfarmex S.A. (Kutno, Poland) (represented by: B. Matusiewicz-Kulig, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Arkadiusz Kaminski (Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada) (represented by: E. Pijewska, M. Mazurek and W. Trybowski, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2019 (Joined Cases R 1861/2018-2 and R 1840/2018-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Polfarmex and Mr Kaminski.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 July 2019 (Joined Cases R 1861/2018-2 and R 1840/2018-2) to the extent that it upheld the registration of the European Union trade mark No 9262767 in respect of ‘cars’ in Class 12 other than ‘racing cars’;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(*) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.