EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-284/09 P: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2010 — Meister v OHIM (Appeal — Public service — Officials — Staff report — Late drawing up of assessment reports — Subject-matter of the action at first instance — Late reply to complaints — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TB0284(01)

62009TB0284(01)

June 21, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.8.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/45

(Case T-284/09 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Appeal - Public service - Officials - Staff report - Late drawing up of assessment reports - Subject-matter of the action at first instance - Late reply to complaints - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2010/C 221/74

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Herbert Meister (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: H.-J Zimmermann, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Faedo, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and E. Winter, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 May 2009 in Joined Cases F-138/06 and F-37/08 Meister v OHIM [2009], not yet published in the ECR, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the order

1.The appeal is dismissed;

2.Herbert Meister shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in connection with these proceedings.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.

Language of the case: German

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia