- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-18/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 10 January 2018 — Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0018
62018CN0018
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.3.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 104/21
(Case C-18/18)
(2018/C 104/26)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek
Defendant: Facebook Ireland Limited
Questions referred
1.Does Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’) generally preclude any of the obligations listed below of a host provider which has not expeditiously removed illegal information, specifically not just this illegal information within the meaning of Article 14(1)(a) of the Directive, but also other identically worded items of information:
a.a.worldwide?
a.b.in the relevant Member State?
a.c.of the relevant user worldwide?
a.d.of the relevant user in the relevant Member State?
2.In so far as Question 1 is answered in the negative: Does this also apply in each case for information with an equivalent meaning?
3.Does this also apply for information with an equivalent meaning as soon as the operator has become aware of this circumstance?
(1) OJ 2000 L 178, p. 1.