- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-574/20, Finanzamt Österreich: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht -Austria) — XO v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social security — Family benefits — Indexation based on price — Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law — No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings — Question manifestly inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CB0574
62020CB0574
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 164/20
(Case C-574/20, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) Finanzamt Österreich)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Social security - Family benefits - Indexation based on price - Answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law - No connection between the question referred for a preliminary ruling and the dispute in the main proceedings - Question manifestly inadmissible)
(2023/C 164/25)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: XO
Defendant: Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Waldviertel
Operative part of the order
1.Examination of the first question referred for a preliminary ruling has revealed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012, in the light of Article 45 TFEU.
2.The second question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesfinanzgericht (Federal Finance Court, Austria) is manifestly inadmissible.
Language of the case: German.
*
ECLI:EU:C:2023:164