- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-25/10: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — BASF Schweiz and BASF Lampertheim v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for tin stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Withdrawal of the decision — Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0025
62010TB0025
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.1.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 6/16
(Case T-25/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for tin stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Withdrawal of the decision - Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 6/28
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: BASF Schweiz AG, formerly BASF Speciality Chemicals Holding GmbH (Basel, Switzerland), and BASF Lampertheim GmbH (Lampertheim, Germany) (represented by: F. Montag and T. Wilson, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Ronkes Agerbeek and R. Sauer, Agents, and W. Berg, lawyer)
Re:
Application for the annulment of Articles 1 and 2 of Commission Decision final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.589 — Heat Stabilisers) in so far as those provisions concern the applicants and, in the alternative, an application for a reduction of the fines imposed on the applicants in Article 2 of that decision.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.