- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-13/15: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Media Logistik (PostModern) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark PostModern — Earlier national word mark POST and earlier EU word mark Deutsche Post — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0013
62015TA0013
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 256/19
(Case T-13/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark PostModern - Earlier national word mark POST and earlier EU word mark Deutsche Post - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)
(2017/C 256/18)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: initially K. Hamacher and C. Giersdorf, K. Hamacher, and finally K. Hamacher and G. Müllejans, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Media Logistik GmbH (Dresden, Germany) (represented by: S. Risthaus, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 November 2014 (Case R 2063/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Deutsche Post and Media Logistik.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Deutsche Post AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.