- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-515/20: Action brought on 17 August 2020 — Puma v EUIPO — Caterpillar (SPEEDCAT)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0515
62020TN0515
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 329/24
(Case T-515/20)
(2020/C 329/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caterpillar Inc. (Peoria, Illinois, United States)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SPEEDCAT — Application for registration No 16 703 225
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2020 in Case R 1016/2019-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.