- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-219/24, Tallinna linn: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 22 March 2024 – A and Others v Tallinna linn
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0219
62024CN0219
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/3163
(Case C-219/24, Tallinna linn)
(C/2024/3163)
Language of the case: Estonian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: A and Others
Defendant: Tallinna linn
Questions referred
Can Article 14(3) of Directive 2000/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on the protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work and points 1 and 2 of Annex VII thereto, read in conjunction with recital 8, Article 1(1) and Article 3(1) and (2) of that directive, be interpreted as compatible with a provision whereby employers are entitled to require their employees who are exposed to biological agents to undergo vaccination?
Explanatory questions:
(a) Does vaccination constitute a measure of health protection at work within the meaning of Article 14(3) of Directive 2000/54/EC which the employer may order in the context of an existing employment contract without the consent of the worker exposed to biological agents?
(b) Is it compatible with Article 1(3), Article 6(1) and (2)(a) and (g), and Article 9(1)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 89/391/EEC (2) of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work and with Article 3(1), Article 31(1) and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union for an employer to make vaccination compulsory in the context of an existing employment contract?
(1) OJ 2000 L 262, p. 21.
(2) OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3163/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—