- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-2/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia (Spain) lodged on 2 January 2017 — Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social, Jesús Crespo Rey
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0002
62017CN0002
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.4.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 104/33
(Case C-2/17)
(2017/C 104/47)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social
Other parties: Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social, Jesús Crespo Rey
Questions referred
1.Must the expression ‘the contribution basis in Spain which is closest in time to the reference periods’, referred to in Annex XI(G)(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, be interpreted as excluding those contribution bases arising from the application of Spanish domestic legislation (1) under which a migrant worker who has returned to Spain and whose actual final Spanish contributions are higher than the minimum bases may conclude an agreement maintaining the contributions in accordance only with the minimum bases, whereas, if he were a non-migrant worker, he could have concluded such an agreement on higher bases?
2.In the event of an affirmative answer to the previous question, and in accordance with Annex XI(G)(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004, do taking the last actual contributions made in Spain, duly updated, and regarding the contribution period under the agreement maintaining contributions as a neutral period or interval constitute remedies appropriate for indemnifying the damage done to the migrant worker?
(1) OJ 2004, L 166, p. 1.