- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-78/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2020 — European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Admissibility — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Existence of a restriction — Burden of proof — Indirect discrimination linked to the origin of the capital — Article 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to freedom of association — National rules imposing on associations receiving financial support sent from other Member States or from third countries legally binding obligations of registration, declaration and publication which can be enforced — Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to respect for private life — Article 8(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to the protection of personal data — National rules imposing the disclosure of information on persons providing financial support to associations and of the amount of that support — Justification — Overriding reason in the public interest — Transparency of the financing of associations — Article 65 TFEU — Public policy — Public security — Fight against money laundering, financing of terrorism and organised crime — Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0078
62018CA0078
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 271/2
(Case C-78/18) (*)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Admissibility - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Existence of a restriction - Burden of proof - Indirect discrimination linked to the origin of the capital - Article 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to freedom of association - National rules imposing on associations receiving financial support sent from other Member States or from third countries legally binding obligations of registration, declaration and publication which can be enforced - Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Right to respect for private life - Article 8(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Right to the protection of personal data - National rules imposing the disclosure of information on persons providing financial support to associations and of the amount of that support - Justification - Overriding reason in the public interest - Transparency of the financing of associations - Article 65 TFEU - Public policy - Public security - Fight against money laundering, financing of terrorism and organised crime - Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(2020/C 271/02)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Havas, L. Malferrari and K. Talabér-Ritz, then by V. Di Bucci, L. Havas and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz and H. Shev, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Declares that, by adopting the provisions of the a külföldről támogatott szervezetek átláthatóságáról szóló 2017. évi LXXVI. törvény (Law No LXXVI of 2017 on the Transparency of Organisations which receive Support from Abroad), which impose obligations of registration, declaration and publication on certain categories of civil society organisations directly or indirectly receiving support from abroad exceeding a certain threshold and which provide for the possibility of applying penalties to organisations that do not comply with those obligations, Hungary has introduced discriminatory and unjustified restrictions on foreign donations to civil society organisations, in breach of its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Articles 7, 8 and 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
2.Orders Hungary to pay the costs;
3.Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to bear its own costs.
* Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 211, 18.6.2018.