I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Financial assistance paid in the context of the Daphne II programme - Determination of the amount of the final grant - Debit note - Measure open to challenge - Obligation to state reasons - Fair trial - Errors of assessment)
2013/C 313/25
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented: initially by B. Henning, then U. Claus and M. Uhmann, and finally by C. Otto, S. Reichmann and L.-J. Schmidt, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by S. Grünheid and B. Simon, then S. Grünheid and F. Dintilhac, acting as Agents)
Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission contained in the debit note of 26 November 2007, in which it requested the applicant to repay the sum of EUR 23 228,07 which the Commission paid to the applicant pursuant to the Daphne Grant Agreement (JLS/DAP/2004-1/080/YC).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 107, 26.4.2008.