I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark PEGADOR - Earlier EU word mark PECCATORE - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/179)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Dyadema Srl (San Zenone degli Ezzelini, Italy) (represented by: F. Celluprica, F. Fischetti and F. De Bono, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pegador GmbH (Emsdetten, Germany) (represented by: E. Haag and S. Krämer, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 September 2023 (R 331/2023-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Dyadema Srl to bear its own costs and those incurred by Pegador GmbH;
3.Orders the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/179/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*
* Language of the case: English.
* * *