- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-415/24: Action brought on 7 August 2024 – Cham Wings Airlines v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0415
62024TN0415
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5834
(Case T-415/24)
(C/2024/5834)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Cham Wings Airlines LLC (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: L. Cloquet, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1510 (1) of 27 May 2024 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, as far as it applies to the applicant;
—annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1517 (2) of 27 May 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, as far as it applies to the applicant; and
—sentence the Council to pay full costs and expenses of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Council made a manifest error in assessing the facts by considering that the applicant was ‘benefitting from, and providing support to the Syrian regime’.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the general principle of proportionality.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons as provided in Article 296(2) TFEU.
(1) OJ L, 2024/1510.
(2) OJ L, 2024/1517.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5834/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
END