EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006.#Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Workers - Freedom of movement - Use of vehicles registered abroad and made available to the worker by the employer residing abroad.#Case C-232/03.

ECLI:EU:C:2006:128

62003CJ0232

February 23, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case C-232/03)

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Workers – Freedom of movement – Use of vehicles registered abroad and made available to the worker by the employer residing abroad

Freedom of movement for workers – Workers – Restrictions (Art. 39 EC) (see paras 49-52, 55, operative part 1)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Articles 10 EC and 39 EC – Conditions for the use by workers residing in Finland and employed abroad of vehicles registered abroad and made available to them by the employer

Operative part:

The Court:

1.Declares that, by preventing cross-frontier workers residing in Finland and employed in another Member State from benefiting from the use of company vehicles which are made available by their employers established in another Member State and registered in the latter State on the sole ground that the cross-frontier workers concerned reside on Finnish territory, into which the vehicles belonging to their employers have been imported,

and by preventing the cross-frontier workers concerned from benefiting, for professional and private purposes, from the use of company vehicles which are made available by their employers established in another Member State and registered in the latter State, while those vehicles are neither intended to be used mainly in Finland on a permanent basis nor, in fact, used in that way, on the sole ground that those workers reside on Finnish territory, into which the vehicles belonging to their employers have been imported,

the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 39 EC;

2.Dismisses the remainder of the application;

3.Orders each party to bear its own costs;

4.Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia