- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-338/14: Order of the General Court of 27 January 2015 — UNIC v Commission (Action for annulment — Joint actions to promote sustainable development economically, socially and environmentally in developing countries — Generalised tariff preferences granted to treated and partly treated leather originating from India, Pakistan and Ethiopia — Rejection of the application for a temporary withdrawal of the benefit of generalised preferences — Measure not subject to review — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0338
62014TB0338
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.3.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 96/20
(Case T-338/14)(Action for annulment - Joint actions to promote sustainable development economically, socially and environmentally in developing countries - Generalised tariff preferences granted to treated and partly treated leather originating from India, Pakistan and Ethiopia - Rejection of the application for a temporary withdrawal of the benefit of generalised preferences - Measure not subject to review - Inadmissibility)
(2015/C 096/26)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Unione nazionale industria conciaria (UNIC) (Milan, Italy) (represented by: A. Fratini and M. Bottino, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and D. Recchia, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 19 March 2014 addressed to the applicant and rejecting its request for initiation of a temporary withdrawal procedure in respect of the generalised preferential arrangements granted to the Republic of India, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia with regard to raw hides and semi-manufactured leather goods.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is rejected as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention made by the Republic of Italy.
3.The Unione nazionale industria conciaria (UNIC) shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.
Language of the case: Italian.
(1) OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2015:140