- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-78/15: Action brought on 16 February 2015 — Mudhook Marketing v OHIM (IPVanish)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0078
62015TN0078
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 127/32
(Case T-78/15)
(2015/C 127/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Mudhook Marketing, Inc. (Winter Park, United States) (represented by: A. Dellmeier and H. Eckermann, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘IPVanish’ — Application for registration No 2 330 271
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 in Case R 1417/2014-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the contested decision;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.