I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-454/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS - Earlier EU figurative mark CORE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 463/43)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: G-Core Innovations Sàrl (Contern, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Axel Karnøe Søndergaard, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and D. Gája, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Coretransform GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, lawyer)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 May 2021 (Case R 22/2021-2) (‘the contested decision’).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders G-Core Innovations Sàrl to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.