I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-53/14)(1)
((Arbitration clause - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Reimbursement of a portion of the amounts paid and flat-rate compensation - No need to adjudicate in part - Costs eligible for EU funding - Penalty clause - Manifestly excessive character))
(2016/C 111/22)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH (Ottobrunn, Germany) (represented by: initially, M. Núñez Müller and T. Becker, and, subsequently, M. Núñez Müller, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and F. Moro, acting as Agents)
Application for a declaration, first, that the Commission is not entitled to require the applicant to reimburse advances paid under three contracts and, secondly, that the applicant is not required to pay flat-rate compensation to the Commission.
The Court:
1.Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the second and third heads of claim of the action;
2.Declares that the sums payable as flat-rate compensation by Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH are to be reduced by an amount equivalent to 10 % of the advances to be reimbursed under the contracts concerning the projects HyWays, HyApproval and HarmonHy;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Orders Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik and the European Commission to bear their own respective costs.
(1)
OJ C 129, 28.4.2014.