I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case F-94/15) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil service - EEAS staff - Staff Committee - Election of the Staff Committee members - Validity - Fifth paragraph of Article 1 of Annex II to the Staff Regulations - EEAS electoral regulations - First ballot - Quorum not attained - Extension of the polling period - Supplementary extension of the polling period - Failure to organise a second ballot - Unlawfulness))
(2016/C 191/71)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Oren Wolff (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T.Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: initially M. Silva and S. Marquardt, Agents, then G.-J. van Hegelsom, S. Marquardt and E. Chaboureau, Agents, and lastly G.-J. van Hegelsom, S. Marquardt and E. Chaboureau, Agents, M. Troncoso Ferrer, F.-M. Hislaire and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers)
Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s challenge brought against the result of the elections to the EEAS Staff Committee.
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of 23 April 2015 by which the European External Action Service rejected Oren Wolff’s request seeking that the result of the elections of the members of the Staff Committee be deemed invalid;
2.Declares that the European External Action Service shall bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Wolff.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 294, 07/09/2015, p. 83.