I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 166/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Andreas Stihl AG & Co. KG (Waiblingen, Germany) (represented by: S. Völker, M. Pemsel and C. Eulenpesch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Giro Travel Company (Roman, Romania)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU colour mark representing the combination of colours grey and orange — Trade mark registration No 7 472 723
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 January 2018 in Case R 200/2017-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs including the costs in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Article 4 in connection with Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 2017/1001.