- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-207/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Poland and Others (Appeal — Annulment of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 — Article 16(4) and (5) TEU — Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions — Application ratione temporis — Council’s voting rules — Qualified majority)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0207
62021CA0207
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.9.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 359/6
(Case C-207/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Annulment of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 - Article 16(4) and (5) TEU - Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions - Application ratione temporis - Council’s voting rules - Qualified majority)
(2022/C 359/06)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: Ł. Habiak, K. Herrmann, R. Tricot and C. Valero, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Belgium, Republic of Bulgaria, French Republic, Hungary, Kingdom of Sweden (represented initially by H. Eklinder, J. Lundberg, C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, R. Shahsavan Eriksson, H. Shev and O. Simonsson, and subsequently by H. Eklinder, C. Meyer-Seitz, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, R. Shahsavan Eriksson, H. Shev and O. Simonsson, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.
Language of the case: Polish