- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-519/15: Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — myToys.de v EUIPO — Laboratorios Indas (myBaby) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark myBaby — Earlier EU word, and EU figurative and national word marks MAYBABY, May BaBy and MAY BABY — Ancillary appeal — Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 — Merely confirmatory decision — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TB0519
62015TB0519
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.9.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 300/29
(Case T-519/15)(1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark myBaby - Earlier EU word, and EU figurative and national word marks MAYBABY, May BaBy and MAY BABY - Ancillary appeal - Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No 216/96 - Merely confirmatory decision - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 300/36)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: myToys.de GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Hauss-Löhde and M. Mette, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Laboratorios Indas, SA (Pozuelo de Alarcon, Spain) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2015 (Case R 1002/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Indas and myToys.de.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.The action is dismissed;
3.European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 363, 3.11.2015.