- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-462/20: Action brought on 16 July 2020 — ZU v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0462
62020TN0462
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.10.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 329/16
(Case T-462/20)
(2020/C 329/34)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decisions of the Appointing Authority of 5 September 2019, denying information relevant for his defence, and of 6 April 2020, rejecting his complaint;
—order the defendant to pay an amount of EUR 50 000, in compensation for the non-material damage suffered, together with interest at the legal rate until payment in full has been made; and
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging violation of the applicant’s right of defence and his right to effective remedy.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the Appointing Authority made a manifest error in assessing the subject matter of the complaint, omitting a key plea and showing a disregard for the likelihood of/change in the applicant’s legal situation.