EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-727/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2023 — TO v EUAA (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Temporary staff — Recruitment — External vacancy notice [confidential] — Decision not to extend the validity of a reserve list — Time limit for complaints — Publication on the internet — No excusable error — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0727

62021TA0727

March 15, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

8.5.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/35

(Case T-727/21) (*)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Temporary staff - Recruitment - External vacancy notice [confidential] - Decision not to extend the validity of a reserve list - Time limit for complaints - Publication on the internet - No excusable error - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 164/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Asylum (represented by: P. Eyckmans and M. Stamatopoulou, acting as Agents, and T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and T. Payan, lawyers)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of Decision EASO/HR/2020/2331 of the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) of 18 December 2020 not to extend, by an additional year, the validity of the reserve list drawn up following selection procedure [confidential] on which her name appeared and, secondly, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders TO to pay the costs.

(*)

Language of the case: French

ECLI:EU:C:2023:140

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia