- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-343/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 27 May 2022 — PT v VB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0343
62022CN0343
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.9.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/17
(Case C-343/22)
(2022/C 340/21)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant and appellant on a point of law: PT
Claimant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: VB
Question referred
Must Article 34(2) of the Lugano Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters of 30 October 2007 (‘the Lugano Convention’) (1) be interpreted as meaning that the statement of claim in an action seeking repayment of a debt, which was brought after a Swiss order for payment had been issued previously and which did not include an application for the annulment of the objection lodged against the order for payment, constitutes the document which instituted the proceedings?
(1) OJ 2009 L 147, p. 1.