EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-143/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single judge) of 18 June 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Rejection by the appointing authority of a claim for reimbursement of the costs incurred in proceedings — Action for annulment having the same purpose as an application for taxation of costs — Manifestly inadmissible)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FB0143

62011FB0143

June 18, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

31.8.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/50

(Case F-143/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Civil service - Rejection by the appointing authority of a claim for reimbursement of the costs incurred in proceedings - Action for annulment having the same purpose as an application for taxation of costs - Manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 252/91

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision not to reimburse a quarter of the costs incurred by the applicant in Case F-81/09 Marcuccio v Commission, which it was ordered to pay by judgment of 15 February 2011.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

2.Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 26.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia