I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Earlier international word mark RODA and earlier national word marks BODEGAS RODA, RODA I and RODA II – Application for a Community word mark ODA – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 56, 61, 63)
APPLICATION for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2004 (Case R 691/2003-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Bodegas Roda SA and Castell del Remei, SL.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark ODA for goods in Class 33 – Application No 1655786
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Bodegas Roda, SA
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
International word mark RODA (No 703486), Spanish word mark BODEGAS RODA for wines and spirits in Class 33, Spanish word marks RODA (No 1757553), RODA I (No 2006616), RODA II (No 2006615) and national Greek mark RODA (No 137050) for wines and spirits in Class 33, commercial name BODEGAS RODA for the ‘commerce dedicated to the development and growing of wine’
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition allowed and application for registration dismissed
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders the applicant to pay the costs.