- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-308/16: Action brought on 13 June 2016 — Marsh v EUIPO (ClaimsExcellence)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0308
62016TN0308
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 287/27
(Case T-308/16)
(2016/C 287/33)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Marsh GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: W. Riegger, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ClaimsExcellence’ — Application No 13 847 462
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 in Case R 2358/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.