I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 271/49)
Language in which the application was lodged: Czech
Applicant: MPM-Quality v.o.s. (Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elton Hodinářská a.s. (Nové Město nad Metují, Czech Republic)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark PRIM — Application No 12 030 441
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 March 2023 in Joined Cases R 1308/2022-2 and R 1325/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul operative parts I., II., IV. and V. of the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.