- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-444/09: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2012 — La City v OHIM — Bücheler and Ewert (citydogs) (Community trade mark — Appointment of a new representative — Applicant’s failure to act — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TB0444
62009TB0444
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.7.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 209/7
(Case T-444/09)(1)
(Community trade mark - Appointment of a new representative - Applicant’s failure to act - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 209/11
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: La City (La Courneuve, France) (represented initially by: S. Bénoliel-Claux, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: S. Schäffner and R. Pethke, Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Andreas Bücheler and Konstanze Ewert (Engelskirchen, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2009 (Case R 233/2008-1) relating to opposition proceedings between (1) La City and (2) Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.
2.La City, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert shall each bear their own costs.
(1)
OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.
* Language of the case: German.