- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-554/16: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — EP Agrarhandel GmbH v Bundesminister für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 — Support for farmers — Suckler-cow premium — Second paragraph of Article 117 — Transmission of information — Decision 2001/672/EC, as amended by Decision 2010/300/EU — Movements of bovine animals to summer grazing in mountain areas — Article 2(4) — Time limit for notification of the movement — Calculation — Notifications out of time — Eligibility for the payment of premiums — Condition — Taking account of the time limit for dispatch)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0554
62016CA0554
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-554/16) (*1)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: EP Agrarhandel GmbH
Defendant: Bundesminister für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2(4) of Commission Decision 2001/672/EC of 20 August 2001 laying down special rules applicable to movements of bovine animals when put out to summer grazing in mountain areas, as amended by Commission Decision 2010/300/EU of 25 May 2010, must be interpreted as precluding a national provision under which, for the purpose of compliance with the time limit for notification of movements to summer grazing, the date of receipt of the notification is regarded as the determining factor.
* Language of the case: German.
(1) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.