I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Dependent child allowance - Article 2 of Annex VII of the Statute - Concept of ‘dependent child’ - Refusal to grant dependent child status to a student receiving a grant - Actual maintenance of the child - Health insurance scheme)
(2022/C 24/35)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: KR (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)
Action under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 25 October 2019 to no longer consider the applicant’s child as a dependent child, within the meaning of Article 2 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, from 1 September 2019.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders KR to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.