EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-166/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 November 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages — Directive 92/83/EEC — Exemption from the harmonised excise duty — Ethyl alcohol used for the production of medicines — Article 27(1)(d) — Exemption conditional on placing the alcohol under a duty suspension arrangement — No facility to obtain a refund of the excise duty paid — Principle of proportionality)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0166

62021CA0166

November 24, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

23.1.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/7

(Case C-166/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages - Directive 92/83/EEC - Exemption from the harmonised excise duty - Ethyl alcohol used for the production of medicines - Article 27(1)(d) - Exemption conditional on placing the alcohol under a duty suspension arrangement - No facility to obtain a refund of the excise duty paid - Principle of proportionality)

(2023/C 24/08)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented initially by C. Perrin and M. Siekierzyńska, and subsequently by C. Perrin and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and A. Kramarczyk-Szaładzińska, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: O. Serdula, M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland;

3.Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 148, 26.4.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia