EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-144/10: Action brought on 29 March 2010 — Space Beach Club v OHIM — Flores Gómez (SpS space of sound)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0144

62010TN0144

March 29, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/49

(Case T-144/10)

2010/C 134/79

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Space Beach Club SA (San Jorge (Ibiza), Spain) (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Miguel Ángel Flores Gómez (Madrid, Spain)

Form of order sought

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM and refuse registration of Community trade mark application No 5683693;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Miguel Ángel Flores Gómez

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the verbal component ‘SpS space of sound’ (Application No 5 683 693) for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 41.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The defendant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish figurative marks which contain the word element ‘SPACE’ (Nos 2 021 783, 2 610 677, 2 644 838, 2 644 839, 2 654 511, 2 694 428, 2 583 870, 3 175 742 and 4 529 814) for goods and services in Classes 9, 25 and 41.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Action dismissed.

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia