EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-325/22, Ministar na zemedelieto, hranite i gorite: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna — Bulgaria) — TS, HI v Ministar na zemedelieto, hranite i gorite (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Aid granted by Member States — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concept of an ‘undertaking’ — Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Recovery of unlawful aid — Decision (EU) 2015/456 — Swaps of forest land — Determining the ‘market value’)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0325

62022CA0325

October 19, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/1110

(Case C-325/22, (1) Ministar na zemedelieto, hranite i gorite)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Aid granted by Member States - Article 107(1) TFEU - Concept of an ‘undertaking’ - Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Recovery of unlawful aid - Decision (EU) 2015/456 - Swaps of forest land - Determining the ‘market value’)

(C/2023/1110)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: TS, HI

Defendant: Ministar na zemedelieto, hranite i gorite

Operative part of the judgment

1.Commission Decision (EU) 2015/456 of 5 September 2014 on the aid scheme No SA.26212 (11/C) (ex 11/NN — ex CP 176/A/08) and No SA.26217 (11/C) (ex 11/NN — ex CP 176/B/08) implemented by the Republic of Bulgaria in the context of swaps of forest land must be interpreted as meaning that only persons who have acquired land in the context of the forest land swap transactions concerned by that decision and who use that land for the purposes of an economic activity are to be regarded as undertakings in receipt of State aid for the purposes of Article 107(1) TFEU.

2.Article 107(1) TFEU and Article 16(3) of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 [TFEU] must be interpreted as not precluding the criteria for determining the amount of State aid received on the acquisition of land, in the context of a forest land swap, from being based on the average prices of registered property transactions relating to land with similar characteristics to that being valued and located close to it, in which at least one of the parties is a merchant, concluded within a period of 12 months prior to the valuation, provided that the application of such criteria is compatible with the Commission’s decision on the recovery of that aid and that they make it possible to determine the market value of that land at the time of the swap transaction.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1110/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

*

Language of the case: Bulgarian.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia