EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010. # Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès v European Commission and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). # Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No q1049/2001 - Documents relating to the award of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence to the University of Cyprus - Documents emanating from a third party - Partial refusal of access - Action for annulment - Time-limit for action - Inadmissibility - Objection of illegality - Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - Duty to give reasons. # Case T-439/08.

ECLI:EU:T:2010:442

62008TJ0439

October 21, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-439/08)

Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the award of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence to the University of Cyprus – Documents emanating from a third party – Partial refusal of access – Action for annulment – Time-limit for action – Inadmissibility – Objection of illegality – Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests – Duty to give reasons

5. Actions for annulment – Actionable measures – Concept – Measures producing binding legal effects – Decision of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) partially to refuse access to Commission documents following a fresh application – Assessment as to whether that decision definitive or otherwise – Obligation to bring a fresh confirmatory application for access – None (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(1), (3) and (7), 6(1), 7 and 8(1)) (see paras 73-75, 78)

6. European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Documents originating from third parties – Prior consultation of third parties concerned – Scope – Mandatory nature – None – Discretion of the institutions (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Art. 4(4)) (see para. 95)

7. European Communities – Community institutions and bodies – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions to the right of access to documents – Conditions – Restrictive interpretation – Principle of proportionality – Obligation on the institution or body to make a concrete and individual examination of documents – Possibility of granting partial access to documents (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(2), (3) and (6)) (see paras 105-108)

11. Acts of the institutions – Statement of reasons – Obligation – Scope (Art. 253 EC; European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Arts 4(1)(b), (2) and (3)) (see paras 146-150)

12. Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Point from which time starts to run – Measure not published and not notified to the applicant – Precise knowledge of the content and reasons – Duty to request the whole text of the decision within a reasonable time once its existence is known – Request formulated more than four months after existence of the contested decision became known – Unreasonable delay – Inadmissibility of the application (Art. 230, fifth para., EC) (see paras 157-161)

13. Procedure – Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings – Head of claim first raised at the reply stage – Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see paras 168-169)

Re:

ANNULMENT, firstly, of the decision of the EACEA of 1 August 2008, concerning a request for access to certain documents relating to the award of a Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence to the University of Cyprus and, secondly, of Commission Decision C(2007) 3749 of 8 August 2007 relating to an individual decision to award a subsidy within the framework of the Lifelong Learning Programme, Jean Monnet sub-programme.

Operative part

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Ms Kalliope Agapiou Joséphidès to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia