- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-205/15: Action brought on 24 April 2015 — Aguirre and Company v OHIM — Puma (Representation of a sports shoe)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0205
62015TN0205
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.6.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 205/36
(Case T-205/15)
(2015/C 205/49)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Aguirre and Company, SA. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Pomares Caballero and A. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark representing a sports shoe —Community trade mark No 1050520-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 January 2015 in Case R 696/2013-3
Forms of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—alter the contested decision so as to find that the ground of invalidity laid down in Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 found by the Board of Appeal is not met in this case;
—or, alternatively, annul the contested decision;
—and, in any event, order OHIM to pay the costs and the costs of the applicant.
Pleas in law
—infringement of an essential procedural requirement in that the contested decision contained inconsistent statements with the result that it is insufficiently reasoned.
—infringement of Article 25(1)(e) Regulation No 6/2002.
—infringement of Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002.