I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
29.4.2024
(Case T-91/24)
(C/2024/2770)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Eskişehir, Türkiye) (represented by: A. Căvescu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SC Star Foods Em SRL (Popești Leordeni, Romania)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: European Union design Bags [packaging] (Ornamentation for-) – European Union design No 3 438 852-0001
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 December 2023 in Case R 1016/2023-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before General Court, as well as the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings before EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Articles 94 and 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of the right to be heard and of the right to a fair trial.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2770/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—