- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-464/14 P: Appeal brought on 20 June 2014 by Risto Nieminen against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 April 2014 in Case F-81/12, Nieminen v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0464
62014TN0464
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.8.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 261/45
—
(Case T-464/14 P)
2014/C 261/71
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Risto Nieminen (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by M. de Abreu Caldas, D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought by the appellant
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 10 April 2014 in Case F-81/12 (Risto Nieminen v Council);
—order the Council to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings
Pleas in law and main arguments
The appellant relies on two grounds of appeal.
1.First ground of appeal: infringement of the rights of the defence, in so far as the Civil Service Tribunal found that the appellant had failed to adduce sufficient evidence to show that there had been a manifest error of assessment, even though it was aware that the appellant was not really in a position to do so and despite its refusal to compel the defendant at first instance to produce all the documents relevant for the purposes of determining whether that plea was well founded.
2.Second ground of appeal: distortion of the evidence and the facts.
—