- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-281/23: Action brought on 23 May 2023 — Dana Astra v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0281
62023TN0281
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.7.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/68
(Case T-281/23)
(2023/C 252/81)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Dana Astra IOOO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Lester, Barrister-at-Law, and P. Sellar, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 (2) (‘contested measures’) insofar as they apply to the applicant;
—order the Council to pay the applicant’s costs.
Plea in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, being that the contested measures are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/421 of 24 February 2023 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 41).
(2) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/419 of 24 February 2023 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ 2023 L 61, p. 20).