- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-61/16: Action brought on 12 February 2016 — Coca-Cola v EUIPO — Mitico (Master)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0061
62016TN0061
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.3.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 111/38
(Case T-61/16)
(2016/C 111/46)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: The Coca-Cola Company (Atlanta, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz and S. Baran, Barristers; D. Stone and A. Dykes, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Modern Industrial & Trading Investment Co. Ltd (Mitico) (Damascus, Syria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘Master’ — Application for registration No 9 091 612
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2015 in Case R 1251/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the EU trade mark Applicant to bear their own costs and pay those costs of the Applicant for Annulment at every stage of the opposition and appeal process, including the costs of these proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(5)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009.